Media 1001 Community Radio

The global financial crisis (GFC) and increased costs of upgrading to a digital platform has put great strain on the community radio sector.  With stations greatly depending on listener contribution, community radio reflects the financial situation of its subscribers and donators. Many communities now face a bleak financial future leaving the outlook of their community radio stations much the same.

Stations such as 5TCB, 2SER and FBI have all been struck hard. 5TCB had to going off air in April after 25 years on air “citing financial problems,” while FBI was forced to hold extensive and intrusive fundraisers to raise awareness of the fact that no contributions means no  radio station.

I am a volunteer for radio station 2SER and I can tell you first hand some of the things that are threatening the existence of community radio in contemporary society. To elaborate more on the impact the financial crisis has on the situation I’ll start off by saying that 2SER has 90 000 listeners a week, less then 7% contribute to the station.

Since the GFC hit Australia the number of listeners has not dropped but the number of people contributing has, with 33% of listeners now saying they can’t afford to donate. Apart from this aspect, 2SER is part of Community Broadcasting Association of Australia (CBAA) which is made up of over 21 000 volunteers that donate their time and efforts to power the stations and deliver content.

Many of these volunteers, myself included, have been personally affected by the GFC and find it difficult to keep donating their time without getting paid as they have to start putting more of their efforts into their paid jobs. Whilst I continue to volunteer much the same I can definitely say my financial situations suffers greatly from the fact I have to spend less time at my ‘real’ job.

This type of situation would not have affected me so much in the past because I would have been able to find a job that I could work fewer shifts in however, now many jobs are firing employees that can’t work a lot of shifts and replacing them with those that can. So I have been affected in this way, luckily I am still a student and don’t need to pay for many of the necessities most of the other volunteers need to.

So the GFC has hindered the flow of money coming from sponsors and subscribers, as well as making it more difficult for volunteers to keep donating their time.  2SER is now looking at different methods of boosting the number of subscribers.

It is holding a  Radiothon during the month of October and encouraging people to donate, subscribe or re-subscribe by offering prizes, discounts, privileges and hosting various events around Sydney that require an entrance fee.

However, all of these require volunteers to donate more of their time to answer calls and manage events. In the 2SER office there are sheets of paper stuck to the wall with dates and times of events requiring volunteer assistance. The pages look almost empty with hardly any volunteers able to spare anymore time.

Apart from volunteers, a smaller percent of funding comes from advertising and support from artists. Unlike commercial radio, community stations like 2SER play more Australian and un-signed artists and focus their advertising on local events and music. This type of not mainstream music limits listeners to those that are interested in more underground events and artists.

Comparing this type of approach to say a station like, 104.1 Today F.M. community radio focuses more on their personal style of content and prides itself on being informative. Commercial radio aims to please everybody and it more set on being entertaining then informative. Unfortunately, this type of broad content captures a larger variety of audiences in more age groups.

Commercial radio is also able to host larger personalities and events and give away bigger and more prizes then community radio. Ultimately a community radio station like 2SER caters to a younger demographic which is interested in the arts and real news, they do not get their listeners through ‘shock’ techniques and flashy prizes, but unfortunately this does limit the amount and type of listeners that tune in, in turn decreasing financial funding and advertising funds.

Seeing the many reasons community radio stations suffer financially in normal circumstances and how this is exasperated during the GFC, it becomes clear why they will find it difficult to keep up with the switch to digital radio now.

Digital radio works by “turning both sound and data into digital signals at transmission and then decoding them at the other end.” With most community radio stations to yet even make the switch to playing music using MP3’s, this type of digital upgrade will almost be impossible.

Austereo stations 104.1 Today F.M. and Triple M are supporting the change and it may mean that all stations will now be forced to upgrade as contemporary society is always striving for better and faster technology. This will mean that many radio stations, such as 2SER will literally be wiped out.

With the combination of the GFC, the introduction to digital radio and generally less commercially driven content, the community radio may not be able to survive as a contemporary media practice for too much longer. However  5TCB’s broadcasting general manager, Michelle Bawden, said that “it’s interesting that sometimes you don’t get that degree of support until you’re at a disaster point- until things are really tough.” Hopefully community support will keep community radio up and running no matter what.

Identity- Last Post of the Sem!!!!

“Our identities have no bodies…we obtain order by physical coercion. We believe that from ethics, enlighetened self-interest and commonweal, our governance will emerge”

                                                                                                                                                                                               -John Perry Barlow                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Our identity is no more real then our soul, our feelings or our beliefs. It’s tangibility can be glanced at through choice of clothes, profession or even music tastes, but that is only how we identify ourselves. In a lot of cases our own identity it beyond our choosing, such as when it comes down to “a physical feature of the body…a genealogy or a cultural preference” people are then placed into groups with others that share the same “trait.” 

I am frequently asked what religion I believe in, when I state that I don’t believe in any they often go on to ask what my parents believe in, when I inform them that they too don’t believe in anything there are some people who become exasperated and say ‘but what about your grandparents…what are you by blood??!!’

They are no longer interested in who I am as an individual- they are trying to classify me. Judging and choosing and picking people to be friends with, hire for a job  or teach is far more sensible if you can group them. As Simon During states in the reading, “identity is won at the price of reducing individuality.” 

Although is seems that identity is a futile matter to work on, as we are already grouped, it is still largely based on our perception of reality. “Individuals don’t have a single identity, they have identities,” which means that once we are stripped of our color and cultural heritage we still have plenty to be judged on. 

When a Christian Italian man is in the company of other Christian Italian men, they do not sit around thinking to themselves ‘we are so Christian and Italian and manly’, they judge each-other on the other aspects of their “identities.” These other aspects tend to come from how they “internalise…images of themselves” and ultimatly how they want their image to be externalized and are a type of “hybridity” of identities. 

This raises the issue of “identity politics” a political attempt to justify all identities and put them on an equal playing field. However, it’s greatest downfall is that is “erase[s] internal differences.” When these men start to disagree about treatment of women in third world countries- that fact that they are all Italian and Christian does little to help them. 

Identity politics is the result of fierce division in an attempt to justify identity. Women don’t need different things in life to men, just as Muslims don’t need different things to Jewish people. This type of politics is fighting for the rights of people that all deserve the same rights and should be fighting together for unity- rather then to have each of their  needs met separately but under a different name. 

A Utopia aside, identities are how we communicate with society, amongst society, amongst ourselves and within ourselves. Just as information is easier to take in when it is presented in table form, life is easier to comprehend when everything is grouped- it leaves less room for chaos.

Bibliography

During, Simon. “Debating Identity” In Cultural studies: A Critical Introduction, Routledge: London, 2005, 145-152. 

z3292296


Grammar

” During war, the effect of violence upon language is amplified, euphmeized; imperatives replace dialogue…as war reveals, violence harms language; it imposes silence [and] language is censored and encrypted”

                                                                                                                                                          – James Dawes The Language of War

As a society we follow the ‘rules’ of grammar together, we agree on a correct way of speaking and writing and therefor come to a mutual understanding of what is said and what is meant. However, what happens when we only learn something but aren’t given the opporunty to understand it? That is the relationship the majority of us have with grammar.

There is no better way to  exemplify grammar manipulation then through propaganda, and there is no better way to empitomise propaganda then through war. Annabelle Lukin breaks down grammar beyond word and sentence structure in Reporting War: grammar as covert operation.

A linguist or a good journalist can use grammar to “conceal and distort real meaning.” Unfortunatly, instead of using their powers for good, they tend to be the speech writers for presidents, politicians and even US Defense Secreteries as- seen with Donald Rumsfeld.

When Rumsfield was asked to comment on the Baghdad Museum looting incident, he simply stated “stuff happens.” Camouflaged as an immature and evasisive response, his choice of  words actually used the thought out technique of “middle voice.” He made the ‘looting’ a seperate entity, therefor eliminating a source of blame.

This is how the experience of war “harms language.” Grammar finds all the loopholes and moves through them relentlessly until we are in a jumbled state of passiveness. Nobody is to blame, nothing is wrong, maybe war isn’t so bad, it’s pretty good for the country isn’t it?

Knowing that a bomb can not throw itself, and a gun needs somebody to pull the trigger, why do we still so willingly accept the middle voice in writing? Because, as Luking put it, “the use of language is always ideological.”

Rather then simply a way of living, Michel Foucault explained ideology “[as] an almost ideal way of life for society.” This plays on his concept of “ideological neutrality.” We accept the “passive” and “middle” voices of the media because we want to believe what is being said.

Playing on language and grammar allows the ideal society to be ‘created’ without technically telling a lie. During times of war society is particularly susceptible to this ideological language because we, as humans, don’t want to lose hope.

And so the language of war uses the greatest cencorship tool, grammar, to create “silence.”

Bibliogrpahy

Lukin, A. “Reporting War: Grammer as Cover Operation” Dissent (2003), 14-20.

z3292296

Interupting the Post-Flow Era Idea

“Flow is a sensation that is designed to keep viewers watching”

I’m sorry, but there is no better way to put this; time, space and experience ARE  highly tied into the Teresa Rizzo’s concept of flow and the now apparent “post-flow era.” Time plays into in a simple way, having playlists and PDR’s such as Foxtel iQ, lets us personalise our “media time.” This ‘personalisation’ is revolutionary to the pre conceived notion of flow, where media created “images, sounds and feelings” to mass audiences, working on a level appropriate to all and expecting to be perceived as the centrality of a home. Contrary to the belief that we are now living in a “post-flow era” we are living in an era with the largest range of flow ever. Every new media outlet and source has it’s own flow, all media types have their own flow, every single person is now receiving their own personalise flow. 

Now that we can claim internet, television and music as our own we have to ask the unfortunate question; are these spaces now our places?

“The emphasis here is on the channel as a place to visit rather that tuning in to watch a program that runs at a specific time”

Our playlists represents us, our tastes, our interests, they are personalised how we like it with what we like, so why are they any less of a place then our very own bedroom is? We no longer move through these media forms and stop when we like something. We sift out what we like and put it firmly where we want it. So when we “visit” our playlist it is not us entering a intangible space of intercommunication and sharing, we are visiting shows, music, movies that we clicked on and organised to our clocks. We have interfered with the original state they where in when media introduced them to us, took them out of context, away from commercials and introduced them to an entirely different spatial mode. They are now in our place, and we do not have to share them with anybody.

With our customised bubbles and private places the entire experience of media has shifted. There is no centre and our once continuos flow is now full of “breaks.” Changing from Youtube to Ninemsn to Facebook, the average consumer will browse and flick and change numerous times whilst engaging in media. With no centre and hardly any control of keeping consumers in one place, the flow is flipping out. The entire experience of media  now revolves around us, therefor media revolves around our needs and we can experience all types of media from the perspective of a participant rather then a passive consumer. This takes away from the bond once experiences amongst people when uniting over media and rather creates a personal bond between ourselves and media. The ‘flow’ is our friend suggesting and providing us with things we like, whilst the medium is the conversation channeling it to us. We are not even close to a post-flow era, it’s just had a little make over. 

Bibliography

Rizzo, Teresa. “Programming Your Own Channel: An Archaeology of the Playlist:. In Kenyon, Andrew, Ed. TV Futures: Digital Television Policy in Australia. Carlton, VUC: Melbourne University Press, 2007, 108-134. 

z3292296

Learning From Myself

Past the overwhelming initiation of this new cyber reality to my technology naive existence, I am starting to feel the direct consequences of media in a way that I have never before. I have always observed media, noted its progressions and gladly reaped its benefits. However, somewhere between reading Dolly Magazines and ‘Googleing’ Perez Hilton, Media turned into something I am completly unsure about.

I have literally felt my mind expand in this process of blogging, networking and connecting. I see it leading me into another realm, and I can not imagine there has even been a time in history where progression has moved as rapidly and evidently as it is right now. But with every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction.

The negative effects of media have never been more clear. Over the last few days I can safely say that most of my time has been spent making a blog, creating all the accounts, linking, joining all the groups needed, getting accustomed to the UNSW website and searching for a job on the internet. And I have hated it. The weather is perfect but I did not go to the beach, I did not go  into the university itself and meet other people in my course, I have not met the faculty face-to-face, and I have not gone to employers with an attempt to dazzle them into hiring me. I have not had time to do so, because I am here. I understand that this has been set up for communicational and interacting purposes, but with up to 93% of our communication being non-verbal how can this by any means be considered interaction?

People say that magazines, television shows and celebrities influence how we “should” be, but with the digital world under our finger tips we control how we should be. These websites allow us to be whatever we want to be, but sadly whatever we want to be sometimes isn’t what we are. As we play around with display pictures, settings, comments and blogs, we tell ourselves it’s to express who we really are, but all we’re doing is creating a superficial representation of who we really are. 

So maybe media is the last field I should be entering, but the fact of the matter is I have no choice but to learn media and technology. Without it I will literally fall of the face of the Earth. I won’t get a job, I’ll lose contact with my friends and I would fail university because I would have no idea how to check my assignments. I thought I had a passion for media, but I am now stuck in a place of confusion. As I watch people gain unity through their disunity on this new system I become more and more scared. 

I know this blog has taken on a different tone from the majority of the other blogs I’ve read, but we can’t all feel the same. I don’t love media or technology but I’m trying to because I want to active in society, and if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.